The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human demand on natural resources. It measures the biologically productive land and sea area required to regenerate the resources a population consumes and to absorb the corresponding waste, given prevailing technology and resource management practices. While this indicator provides a useful snapshot of sustainability, critics argue that it oversimplifies complex environmental interactions by aggregating disparate impacts into a single unit (global hectares). Moreover, it does not account for technological innovations that may reduce future resource consumption, nor does it differentiate between renewable and non-renewable resource depletion. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a powerful tool for raising awareness and comparing consumption patterns across nations, prompting debates on equity and the need for systemic change in production and consumption models.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 생태발자국을 지표로 사용하는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 이는 폐기물 흡수가 육지와 해양 지역에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
B. 단일 단위를 사용함으로써 환경 상호작용의 복잡성을 포착하지 못한다.
C. 이는 개발도상국의 자원 소비를 과대평가하고 있다.
D. 이는 서로 다른 국가들의 소비를 비교하는 근거를 제공하지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to capture the complexity of environmental interactions by using a single unit.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first