The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human demand on natural resources. It measures the biologically productive land and sea area required to regenerate the resources a population consumes and to absorb the corresponding waste, given prevailing technology and resource management practices. While this indicator provides a useful snapshot of sustainability, critics argue that it oversimplifies complex environmental interactions by aggregating disparate impacts into a single unit (global hectares). Moreover, it does not account for technological innovations that may reduce future resource consumption, nor does it differentiate between renewable and non-renewable resource depletion. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a powerful tool for raising awareness and comparing consumption patterns across nations, prompting debates on equity and the need for systemic change in production and consumption models.
❓ Según el pasaje, ¿cuál es una crítica importante al indicador de la huella ecológica?
A. Ignora el impacto de la absorción de residuos en las áreas terrestres y marinas.
B. Falla al no capturar la complejidad de las interacciones ambientales al utilizar una sola unidad.
C. Sobrestima el consumo de recursos de los países en desarrollo.
D. No proporciona una base para comparar el consumo de diferentes naciones.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to capture the complexity of environmental interactions by using a single unit.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first