The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in cross-cultural management research. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on interpersonal skills within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses an individual's capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Scholars argue that CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ encompasses the ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Recent studies suggest that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics caution that CQ measurements may oversimplify the dynamic nature of culture, potentially neglecting power imbalances and historical contexts.
❓ 根据文章内容,批评者提到的文化智力(CQ)的主要局限性,以下哪项描述最为准确?
A. A. CQ忽视了情商在跨文化环境中的重要性。
B. B. 文化智力测量可能未能充分考虑到文化的复杂性,包括权力动态和历史因素。
C. C. CQ仅关注行为层面,而忽视了认知过程。
D. D. 已有证据表明,CQ在提升跨国团队绩效方面并未见效。
✅ 正确答案
B. CQ measurements may fail to account for the complexity of culture, including power dynamics and historical factors.