The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological studies, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. While early models focused on biological limits, such as food production or water availability, contemporary scholars argue that technological innovation and trade can effectively expand a region's carrying capacity. However, this optimistic view is challenged by the 'rebound effect', where efficiency gains often lead to increased consumption rather than conservation. A recent study of urban water systems demonstrated that despite advanced recycling technologies, per capita demand continued to rise due to lifestyle changes. This suggests that carrying capacity is not a fixed threshold but a dynamic equilibrium shaped by social choices, economic structures, and cultural values. Consequently, policy interventions aimed solely at technological fixes may be insufficient without addressing underlying consumption patterns.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경적 한계를 해결하기 위해 기술적 해결책에만 의존할 때의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A. 대부분의 지역에서 시행하기에는 너무 비용이 많이 든다.
B. B. 그들은 효율성 증가가 더 높은 소비로 이어질 수 있기 때문에 실패할 수 있다.
C. C. 그들은 국제 무역의 중요성을 무시한다.
D. D. 그들은 오직 물 시스템에만 초점을 맞추며, 다른 자원에는 초점을 맞추지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They may fail because increased efficiency can lead to higher consumption.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first