The concept of 'environmental debt' has gained traction among economists as a framework for understanding the long-term costs of resource depletion. Unlike financial debt, which is quantifiable and governed by contractual obligations, environmental debt is diffuse and often externalized to future generations. For instance, carbon emissions from industrial activities accumulate in the atmosphere, creating a liability that manifests as climate change. This debt is not merely ecological; it imposes economic burdens, such as reduced agricultural productivity and increased healthcare costs. Some scholars argue that conventional GDP metrics fail to account for this depletion, leading to policy decisions that prioritize short-term growth over sustainability. To address this, alternative indicators, like the Genuine Progress Indicator, have been proposed, but their adoption remains limited due to political and methodological challenges. Ultimately, recognizing environmental debt requires a paradigm shift in how we value natural capital, moving beyond market prices to incorporate intergenerational equity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적인 GDP 지표가 환경 부채를 다루지 못하는 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 그들은 생태적 의무가 아닌 재정적 의무에만 집중한다.
B. B) 그들은 자원 고갈과 장기적인 환경 피해의 경제적 비용을 측정하지 않는다.
C. C) 정책 입안자들이 효과적으로 시행하기에는 너무 복잡하다.
D. D) 그들은 설계상 지속 가능성보다 단기 성장을 우선시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) They do not measure the economic costs of resource depletion and long-term environmental damage.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first