The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It quantifies the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to support a given population's consumption patterns and waste absorption. While this measure offers a tangible way to compare sustainability across nations, critics argue that it oversimplifies complex environmental interactions. For instance, it often neglects the varying technological efficiencies in different regions, which can significantly alter the actual resource demand. Moreover, the footprint does not account for the depletion of non-renewable resources, such as fossil fuels, which are not regenerated within a human timescale. Consequently, relying solely on this indicator may lead to misguided policy decisions that fail to address underlying ecological degradation.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 생태발자국이 환경 영향을 측정하는 지표로서 가지는 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 이는 인구의 소비 패턴을 고려하지 못한다.
B. 이는 기술 효율성과 재생 불가능한 자원 고갈에 있어 지역적 차이를 간과하고 있다.
C. 너무 복잡한 국가 간 지속가능성 비교를 제공한다.
D. 이는 자원 사용보다는 폐기물 흡수에만 전적으로 초점을 맞춘다.
✅ 正确答案
It overlooks regional differences in technological efficiency and non-renewable resource depletion.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first