The concept of sustainable urban development has evolved significantly over the past decades, moving from a purely environmental focus to a more integrated approach that includes economic and social dimensions. Recent studies suggest that cities adopting green infrastructure, such as permeable pavements and urban forests, not only mitigate flooding and heat islands but also enhance property values and public well-being. However, critics argue that such measures often prioritize affluent neighborhoods, exacerbating spatial inequality. To address this, planners increasingly advocate for participatory budgeting, whereby residents directly influence how sustainability funds are allocated. This approach, while time-consuming, fosters community ownership and ensures that benefits are distributed more equitably. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on its long-term effectiveness remains limited, highlighting the need for longitudinal research.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 녹색 인프라 계획의 잠재적 단점은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것들은 대부분의 도시가 시행하기에는 너무 비용이 많이 든다.
B. B) 그들은 지역 간 불평등을 악화시킬 수 있다.
C. C) 그들은 오로지 환경적 이점에만 초점을 맞춘다.
D. D) 그들은 주민들의 과도한 참여를 요구한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) They may worsen inequality between different areas.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first