The concept of emotional intelligence, popularized by Daniel Goleman, has been widely embraced in educational and organizational settings. However, recent research suggests that its predictive power for workplace success may be overstated. A meta-analysis by Joseph and Newman (2010) found that while emotional intelligence correlates with job performance, the effect is modest and largely mediated by cognitive ability and personality traits. Moreover, the construct itself is often poorly defined, with overlapping dimensions that challenge its validity as a distinct psychological attribute. Critics argue that the enthusiasm for emotional intelligence has outpaced empirical evidence, leading to its application in hiring and training without sufficient scrutiny. Nevertheless, proponents maintain that specific components, such as emotion regulation, offer unique contributions beyond traditional intelligence measures. This debate underscores the need for more rigorous, context-specific studies to clarify the practical utility of emotional intelligence in professional environments.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная обеспокоенность, высказанная критиками в отношении эмоционального интеллекта?
A. A) Это слишком сложно измерить точно в условиях рабочей среды.
B. B) Его применение в найме и обучении не имеет достаточной эмпирической поддержки.
C. C) Это вообще не имеет никакой корреляции с результатами работы.
D. D) Оно уступает когнитивным способностям во всех аспектах.
✅ 正确答案
B) Its application in hiring and training lacks sufficient empirical support.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first