The concept of emotional intelligence, popularized by Daniel Goleman, has been widely embraced in educational and organizational settings. However, recent research suggests that its predictive power for workplace success may be overstated. A meta-analysis by Joseph and Newman (2010) found that while emotional intelligence correlates with job performance, the effect is modest and largely mediated by cognitive ability and personality traits. Moreover, the construct itself is often poorly defined, with overlapping dimensions that challenge its validity as a distinct psychological attribute. Critics argue that the enthusiasm for emotional intelligence has outpaced empirical evidence, leading to its application in hiring and training without sufficient scrutiny. Nevertheless, proponents maintain that specific components, such as emotion regulation, offer unique contributions beyond traditional intelligence measures. This debate underscores the need for more rigorous, context-specific studies to clarify the practical utility of emotional intelligence in professional environments.
❓ この文章によると、批判者たちが感情的知性に関して提起する主な懸念は何ですか?
A. 職場の環境において正確に測定することはあまりにも困難である。
B. B) 採用や研修におけるその応用には、十分な実証的裏付けが欠けている。
C. C) それは仕事のパフォーマンスとは全く相関関係がない。
D. D) それはあらゆる面において認知能力に影を落とされている。
✅ 正确答案
B) Its application in hiring and training lacks sufficient empirical support.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first