The concept of ecosystem services has gained prominence in environmental policy, yet its economic valuation remains contentious. Proponents argue that assigning monetary values to services such as pollination or water purification encourages conservation by integrating nature into market mechanisms. Critics, however, contend that this utilitarian approach oversimplifies complex ecological interdependencies and risks commodifying intrinsic natural values. A recent study of wetland restoration projects in Europe revealed that while cost-benefit analyses often justify investments, they frequently omit non-material cultural services, leading to skewed priorities. This suggests that valuation frameworks must evolve to incorporate pluralistic values, balancing quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments to achieve sustainable outcomes.
❓ 비평가들이 생태계 서비스의 경제적 가치 평가에 대해 제기하는 주요 우려는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 보전 프로젝트를 위한 충분한 자금을 제공하지 못한다.
B. B. 그것은 복잡한 생태적 관계를 시장 용어로 축소시키며 내재적 가치를 훼손할 수 있다.
C. C. 문화 서비스에 지나치게 집중하여 공급 서비스를 희생하고 있다.
D. D. 유럽의 모든 습지 복원 사례에서 효과가 없는 것으로 입증되었다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It reduces complex ecological relationships to market terms and may undermine intrinsic values.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first