The concept of 'environmental migration' has gained significant academic attention in recent decades, yet its definition remains contested. While early scholarship focused primarily on forced displacement due to sudden-onset disasters, contemporary researchers argue that environmental change often interacts with economic, social, and political factors, creating complex migratory patterns. For instance, slow-onset phenomena such as sea-level rise or desertification may gradually erode livelihoods, leading to planned or voluntary moves rather than emergency evacuations. This nuanced understanding challenges the simplistic dichotomy between 'voluntary' and 'forced' migration, suggesting that environmental drivers exist on a continuum. Moreover, critics point out that labeling individuals as 'environmental refugees' can obscure their legal status and access to protection under international law, which currently recognizes only political persecution as grounds for asylum. Thus, scholars advocate for more precise terminology and policy frameworks that reflect the multifaceted nature of environmentally related mobility.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '환경 난민'이라는 용어에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 이주에 있어 갑작스러운 재해의 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. 이는 경제적 요인에 의해 추진되는 자발적 이주를 설명하지 못한다.
C. 이는 기존 국제 보호 조치 하에서 이주민들의 법적 권리를 훼손할 수 있습니다.
D. 정치적 박해가 환경적 이주에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
It may undermine migrants' legal rights under existing international protections.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first