The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal precision, as human impacts are not uniform across time and space, and the proposed markers may not persist in the geological record over long timescales. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the practical need to communicate the scale of anthropogenic change. Ultimately, whether or not the Anthropocene is formally adopted, it serves as a powerful reminder of humanity's role as a geological agent.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно антропоцена, как описано в отрывке?
A. Действительно ли человеческая деятельность изменила экосистемы Земли
B. Соответствует ли термин достаточной научной строгости и устойчивым геологическим доказательствам.
C. Является ли загрязнение пластиком более значимым, чем радиоактивные осадки
D. Должна ли антропоценовая эпоха заменить голоцен в качестве текущей эпохи
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term has enough scientific rigor and lasting geological evidence
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first