The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal precision, as human impacts are not uniform across time and space, and the proposed markers may not persist in the geological record over long timescales. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the practical need to communicate the scale of anthropogenic change. Ultimately, whether or not the Anthropocene is formally adopted, it serves as a powerful reminder of humanity's role as a geological agent.
❓ この文章で述べられているように、人新世に関する主な論争点は何ですか?
A. 人間の活動が実際に地球の生態系を変えてきたかどうか
B. この用語が十分な科学的厳密性と永続的な地質学的証拠を有するかどうか
C. プラスチック汚染が核降下物よりも重大であるかどうか
D. アントロポセンが完新世に代わって現在の時代となるべきかどうか
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term has enough scientific rigor and lasting geological evidence
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first