The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, fundamentally shapes human societies and their cultural development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as less conducive to technological advancement. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its ethnocentric bias and oversimplification of complex human-environment interactions. Modern scholarship emphasizes a more nuanced approach, recognizing that while environmental factors can influence societal trajectories, human agency, technological innovation, and historical contingencies play equally crucial roles. Consequently, environmental determinism is now largely regarded as an outdated framework, replaced by theories of environmental possibilism, which suggest that the environment provides a range of possibilities that human cultures can exploit in diverse ways.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 결정론이 현대 학자들에 의해 거부된 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 사회를 형성하는 데 있어 기술과 인간의 선택의 역할을 무시했다.
B. B. 그것은 온대 지역에만 적용 가능했고 열대 지역에는 적용되지 않았다.
C. C. 문화적 차이에 대해 어떠한 설명도 제공하지 못했다.
D. D. 그것은 20세기 초반의 불충분한 지리적 데이터에 기반한 것이었다.
✅ 正确答案
A. It ignored the role of technology and human choice in shaping societies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first