The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, fundamentally shapes human societies and their cultural development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as less conducive to technological advancement. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its ethnocentric bias and oversimplification of complex human-environment interactions. Modern scholarship emphasizes a more nuanced approach, recognizing that while environmental factors can influence societal trajectories, human agency, technological innovation, and historical contingencies play equally crucial roles. Consequently, environmental determinism is now largely regarded as an outdated framework, replaced by theories of environmental possibilism, which suggest that the environment provides a range of possibilities that human cultures can exploit in diverse ways.
❓ 文章によると、現代の学者が環境決定論を拒否する主な理由は何ですか?
A. A. それは、社会を形成する上での技術と人間の選択の役割を無視していた。
B. B. それは温帯地域にのみ適用可能であり、熱帯地域には適用できなかった。
C. C. 文化的差異について何の説明も提供しなかった。
D. D. それは20世紀初頭の不十分な地理的データに基づいていた。
✅ 正确答案
A. It ignored the role of technology and human choice in shaping societies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first