The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that climate and terrain directly shape human behavior and societal development, suggesting that civilizations in temperate zones were inherently more advanced. However, this view was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural interactions and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholarship instead emphasizes 'possibilism', where the environment offers a range of possibilities that humans can exploit based on their technology and cultural choices. For instance, the Netherlands transformed its flood-prone landscape through engineering, demonstrating human agency over natural constraints. Yet, recent climate change research reintroduces a nuanced determinism: while humans are not passive recipients, environmental stressors can significantly limit options, particularly in vulnerable regions. Thus, the debate has evolved from binary opposition to a recognition of dynamic feedback between human societies and their environments.
❓ 본문에서 설명된 환경-인간 관계에 대한 학문적 이해의 주요 변화는 무엇인가?
A. A. 환경 결정론에서 환경 영향의 완전한 부정까지
B. B. 가능주의에서 인간의 혁신을 무시하는 새로운 형태의 결정론으로
C. C. 단순한 결정론적 관점에서 환경적 한계와 인간의 행위성을 모두 고려한 미묘한 상호작용으로
D. D. 기술적 해결책에 초점을 맞추는 것에서 자연에 대한 수동적 적응을 강조하는 것으로
✅ 正确答案
C. From a simple deterministic view to a nuanced interaction considering both environmental limits and human agency
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first