The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that climate and terrain directly shape human behavior and societal development, suggesting that civilizations in temperate zones were inherently more advanced. However, this view was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural interactions and for justifying colonialism. Modern scholarship instead emphasizes 'possibilism', where the environment offers a range of possibilities that humans can exploit based on their technology and cultural choices. For instance, the Netherlands transformed its flood-prone landscape through engineering, demonstrating human agency over natural constraints. Yet, recent climate change research reintroduces a nuanced determinism: while humans are not passive recipients, environmental stressors can significantly limit options, particularly in vulnerable regions. Thus, the debate has evolved from binary opposition to a recognition of dynamic feedback between human societies and their environments.
❓ この文章で述べられている、環境と人間の関係に関する学術的理解における主な変化は何ですか?
A. A. 環境決定論から、環境の影響を完全に否定する立場へ
B. B. 可能性主義から、人間の革新性を無視する新たな決定論へ
C. C. 単純な決定論的視点から、環境的制約と人間の主体性の両方を考慮した、より繊細な相互作用へ
D. D. 技術的解決策に焦点を当てることから、自然への受動的適応を重視することへ
✅ 正确答案
C. From a simple deterministic view to a nuanced interaction considering both environmental limits and human agency
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first