The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to warrant a formal boundary in the stratigraphic record. However, critics contend that these changes are not uniformly distributed across the globe, and that the timescale of human influence, while profound, is too brief to align with the deep-time framework of geological epochs. They advocate for a more cautious approach, suggesting that the term 'Anthropocene' should remain a cultural or historical descriptor rather than a formal geological unit. This debate underscores the tension between scientific classification and the recognition of human agency in shaping planetary processes.
❓ В чем заключается основное разногласие между сторонниками и критиками антропоцена как геологической эпохи?
A. Является ли воздействие человека на окружающую среду достаточно значительным, чтобы его можно было измерить
B. Следует ли рассматривать антропоцен как формальную геологическую эпоху или как более широкую концепцию
C. Являются ли пластиковое загрязнение и радиоактивные осадки подходящими маркерами человеческой деятельности
D. Могут ли геологические эпохи определяться изменениями, вызванными деятельностью человека
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a formal geological epoch or a broader concept
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first