The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch, defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinct enough to warrant a formal boundary in the stratigraphic record. However, critics contend that these changes are not uniformly distributed across the globe, and that the timescale of human influence, while profound, is too brief to align with the deep-time framework of geological epochs. They advocate for a more cautious approach, suggesting that the term 'Anthropocene' should remain a cultural or historical descriptor rather than a formal geological unit. This debate underscores the tension between scientific classification and the recognition of human agency in shaping planetary processes.
❓ 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 보는 지지자들과 비판자들 사이의 주요 쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 환경 영향이 측정될 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부
B. 인류세(Anthropocene)가 공식적인 지질 시대(epoch)로 간주되어야 하는지, 아니면 더 넓은 개념으로 보아야 하는지에 대한 문제입니다.
C. 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진이 인간 활동의 적절한 지표인지 여부
D. 지질학적 시대가 인간에 의해 유발된 변화로 정의될 수 있는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a formal geological epoch or a broader concept
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first