The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains a subject of debate. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left unmistakable markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. These markers, they contend, justify a distinct geological boundary. Conversely, skeptics point out that the term lacks the temporal depth of formal geological epochs, which typically span millions of years. They also question whether human impacts are truly global and synchronous, noting that geological boundaries require a clear, worldwide signal. Despite these disagreements, the Anthropocene concept has proven valuable as a heuristic device, prompting interdisciplinary research into human-environment interactions and fostering a broader dialogue about sustainability and planetary stewardship.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная причина, по которой некоторые геологи выступают против официального признания антропоцена новой эпохой?
A. A. Воздействие человека пока не заметно в геологической летописи.
B. B. Предложенная эпоха не соответствует временным и глобальным критериям формальных геологических эпох.
C. C. Термин «антропоцен» слишком сложен для понимания неспециалистами.
D. D. Нет доказательств антропогенных изменений окружающей среды.
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed epoch does not meet the temporal and global criteria of formal geological epochs.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first