The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains a subject of debate. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left unmistakable markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. These markers, they contend, justify a distinct geological boundary. Conversely, skeptics point out that the term lacks the temporal depth of formal geological epochs, which typically span millions of years. They also question whether human impacts are truly global and synchronous, noting that geological boundaries require a clear, worldwide signal. Despite these disagreements, the Anthropocene concept has proven valuable as a heuristic device, prompting interdisciplinary research into human-environment interactions and fostering a broader dialogue about sustainability and planetary stewardship.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 지질학자들이 인류세를 새로운 시대로 공식적으로 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향은 아직 지질학적 기록에서 확인되지 않았다.
B. B. 제안된 시기는 공식 지질 시대의 시간적 및 지구적 기준을 충족하지 못한다.
C. C. '인류세'라는 용어는 비과학자들이 이해하기에는 너무 어렵다.
D. D. 인간에 의한 환경 변화의 증거가 없다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The proposed epoch does not meet the temporal and global criteria of formal geological epochs.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first