The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, radioactive fallout from nuclear tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, as human influence has been gradual and uneven across regions, complicating the identification of a single global start date. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex interplay between natural and human forces, potentially undermining the precision required in geological classification. This debate highlights the tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate urgent environmental concerns, raising questions about whether epochs should reflect planetary changes or societal narratives.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 학자들이 인류세를 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식화하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 영향은 경계를 정의하기에는 전 세계적으로 너무 균일하고 동시적이었다.
B. B. 해당 용어는 인간의 영향이 점진적이고 지역별로 상이한 특성을 제대로 포착하지 못한다.
C. C. 암석 기록에서 플라스틱 오염과 방사성 지표에 대한 증거가 불충분하다.
D. D. 제안된 시대는 환경 커뮤니케이션의 시급성을 다루지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the gradual and regionally varying nature of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first