The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, radioactive fallout from nuclear tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, as human influence has been gradual and uneven across regions, complicating the identification of a single global start date. They suggest that formalizing the Anthropocene might oversimplify the complex interplay between natural and human forces, potentially undermining the precision required in geological classification. This debate highlights the tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate urgent environmental concerns, raising questions about whether epochs should reflect planetary changes or societal narratives.
❓ 本文によると、一部の学者が人新世を地質時代として正式に定めることに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A. 人間の影響は世界的にあまりにも均一かつ同時的であり、境界を定義することはできない。
B. B. この用語は、人間の影響が段階的であり、地域によって異なる性質を捉えることができない。
C. C. 岩石記録におけるプラスチック汚染と放射性マーカーの証拠は不十分である。
D. D. 提案された時代は、環境コミュニケーションの緊急性に対応していない。
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the gradual and regionally varying nature of human influence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first