The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on interpersonal sensitivity, CQ emphasizes cognitive, motivational, and behavioral adaptability to cross-cultural contexts. Researchers argue that CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive (conscious cultural awareness), cognitive (knowledge of norms and practices), motivational (interest and confidence in cross-cultural interactions), and behavioral (capacity to adjust verbal and non-verbal actions). A 2020 meta-analysis by Ott and Michailova found that CQ predicts job performance and expatriate adjustment more strongly than general cognitive ability, particularly in roles requiring frequent intercultural negotiation. However, critics caution that CQ training often oversimplifies cultural differences, potentially reinforcing stereotypes. Thus, while CQ offers a useful framework, its application must be nuanced to avoid essentializing cultures.
❓ 根据文章所述,文化智力培训的一个关键局限性是什么?
A. 它过于注重情商了。
B. 这可能导致文化刻板印象的强化。
C. 它无法预测外派人员的适应情况。
D. 它忽视了适应性的认知维度。
✅ 正确答案
It may lead to the reinforcement of cultural stereotypes.