The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that human influence, while profound, is not yet comparable in duration to the vast timescales of geological time, and that the term oversimplifies the complex interplay between natural and anthropogenic forces. Proponents counter that the scale and permanence of human modifications, from altered sediment flows to mass species extinction, warrant a distinct classification. This debate underscores a deeper question: should geological nomenclature reflect not only physical evidence but also societal responsibility?
❓ 지문에 따르면, 비평가들이 인류세의 공식 인정에 반대하는 주된 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 영향은 지질학적 시간 척도에 비해 너무 최근이고 짧아서 일치하지 않는다.
B. 이 용어는 자연적인 기후 변동의 역할을 무시한다.
C. 인간에 의한 환경 변화에 대한 증거가 불충분하다.
D. 제안된 마커들은 전 세계적으로 분포되어 있지 않습니다.
✅ 正确答案
Human impact is too recent and brief to match geological timescales.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first