The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current epoch in which human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contested. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human impact. Critics, however, contend that these signatures are too variable and recent to define a distinct epoch, suggesting instead that the term 'Anthropocene' is more useful as a cultural or historical concept. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader implications of human agency on planetary processes.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 일부 과학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식적으로 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그 용어는 지질학자가 만든 것이 아니다.
B. B. 인간의 환경에 대한 영향은 충분히 크지 않다.
C. C. 제안된 지표들은 너무 비일관적이고 최근의 것이어서 별개의 시대(epoch)를 정의하기에는 부적합하다.
D. D. 지질 기록에는 인간 활동의 증거가 없다.
✅ 正确答案
C. The proposed markers are too inconsistent and recent to define a distinct epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first