The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current epoch in which human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contested. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human impact. Critics, however, contend that these signatures are too variable and recent to define a distinct epoch, suggesting instead that the term 'Anthropocene' is more useful as a cultural or historical concept. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader implications of human agency on planetary processes.
❓ Según el pasaje, ¿cuál es una razón clave por la que algunos científicos se oponen a reconocer formalmente el Antropoceno como una época geológica?
A. A. El término no fue acuñado por un geólogo.
B. B. El impacto humano en el medio ambiente no es lo suficientemente significativo.
C. C. Los marcadores propuestos son demasiado inconsistentes y recientes para definir una época distinta.
D. D. No hay evidencia de actividad humana en el registro geológico.
✅ 正确答案
C. The proposed markers are too inconsistent and recent to define a distinct epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first