The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the proposal remains contentious. Critics argue that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that the stratigraphic evidence, such as the presence of artificial radionuclides, may not be globally synchronous. Proponents counter that the scale and irreversibility of human-induced changes, including species extinction rates and altered nitrogen cycles, warrant a distinct epoch. This debate underscores a broader tension between scientific classification and societal responsibility, as formalizing the Anthropocene could influence policy frameworks and public perception of environmental stewardship.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식화하는 것에 대한 반대의 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A) 지질 기록에서 인간에 의한 흔적이 전혀 없다는 점.
B. B) 인간과 환경의 상호작용의 복잡성을 그 용어가 포착하지 못한다는 믿음.
C. C) 제안이 자연적 기후 변동에만 전적으로 초점을 맞춘 점.
D. D) 인간 활동으로 인한 환경 변화가 전혀 없는 상태.
✅ 正确答案
B) The belief that the term fails to capture the complexity of human-environment interactions.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first