The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries, as human influence began at different times across regions. Moreover, some scholars suggest that framing the current era as a distinct epoch oversimplifies the complex interplay between natural and anthropogenic processes. Despite this debate, the term has proven valuable in raising public awareness about humanity's role in shaping the planet's future, prompting interdisciplinary research that bridges geology, ecology, and social sciences.
❓ 학자들 사이에서 인류세에 관한 주요 의견 차이는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 활동이 지구 시스템에 측정 가능한 영향을 미치는지 여부.
B. B. 정확한 시기와 그 시점(epoch)의 시작점 정의.
C. C. 환경 인식 증진에 있어 해당 용어의 유용성.
D. D. 지질학 연구에 있어 학제 간 연구의 필요성.
✅ 正确答案
B. The exact timing and definition of the epoch's starting point.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first