The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition as a new geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities have left indelible marks on the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Conversely, skeptics contend that the proposed markers are not globally synchronous or sufficiently distinct from the Holocene, which began approximately 11,700 years ago. Moreover, the temporal scale of human impact, while profound, may be too brief to constitute a durable geological boundary. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader narrative of human influence on Earth systems, raising questions about how we define and perceive our current geological era.
❓ Какова основная причина разногласий относительно официального признания антропоцена новой геологической эпохой?
A. Оказывают ли действия человека какое-либо влияние на изменения окружающей среды
B. Являются ли предлагаемые маркеры глобально согласованными и достаточно отличимыми от голоцена
C. Следует ли заменить термин «антропоцен» на более точное название?
D. Должны ли геологические эпохи определяться влиянием человека или естественными процессами
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are globally consistent and distinct enough from the Holocene
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first