The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition as a new geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities have left indelible marks on the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Conversely, skeptics contend that the proposed markers are not globally synchronous or sufficiently distinct from the Holocene, which began approximately 11,700 years ago. Moreover, the temporal scale of human impact, while profound, may be too brief to constitute a durable geological boundary. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader narrative of human influence on Earth systems, raising questions about how we define and perceive our current geological era.
❓ 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 데 있어 주요 의견 불일치의 원천은 무엇인가?
A. 인간의 활동이 환경 변화를 전혀 초래하지 않았는지
B. 제안된 마커들이 전 지구적으로 일관성이 있고 홀로세와 충분히 구별되는지 여부
C. '인류세'라는 용어가 더 정확한 이름으로 대체되어야 하는지에 대해
D. 지질 시대가 인간의 영향으로 정의되어야 하는지, 아니면 자연적 과정으로 정의되어야 하는지
✅ 正确答案
Whether the proposed markers are globally consistent and distinct enough from the Holocene
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first