The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a complement to traditional measures of cognitive ability. Unlike IQ, which focuses on abstract reasoning, CQ encompasses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. Researchers have identified three primary dimensions: cognitive CQ (knowledge of cultural norms), physical CQ (adaptive behaviors and body language), and emotional/motivational CQ (interest and confidence in cross-cultural interactions). Studies indicate that high CQ predicts success in international assignments, negotiation outcomes, and multicultural teamwork. However, critics argue that CQ may be overgeneralized, as it often assumes cultural homogeneity within nations and overlooks intra-cultural variations. Furthermore, the measurement of CQ relies heavily on self-report questionnaires, which may introduce response biases. Despite these limitations, CQ training programs are increasingly implemented in multinational corporations, suggesting a pragmatic belief in its malleability. Future research should refine the construct by integrating objective performance metrics and longitudinal designs to validate its predictive validity.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 문화 지능(CQ) 개념에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 인지 능력에 너무 많은 비중을 두고 감정적 측면을 소홀히 한다.
B. 문화가 한 국가 내에서 균일하다고 가정하며, 내부적 다양성을 무시한다.
C. 직무 성공을 예측하는 데 있어 IQ보다 덜 중요하다는 것이 입증되었습니다.
D. 자기보고식 설문지를 사용하여 측정할 수 없는 이유는 응답 편향 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
It assumes that cultures are uniform within a country, ignoring internal diversity.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first