The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a complement to traditional measures of cognitive ability. Unlike IQ, which focuses on abstract reasoning, CQ encompasses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. Researchers have identified three primary dimensions: cognitive CQ (knowledge of cultural norms), physical CQ (adaptive behaviors and body language), and emotional/motivational CQ (interest and confidence in cross-cultural interactions). Studies indicate that high CQ predicts success in international assignments, negotiation outcomes, and multicultural teamwork. However, critics argue that CQ may be overgeneralized, as it often assumes cultural homogeneity within nations and overlooks intra-cultural variations. Furthermore, the measurement of CQ relies heavily on self-report questionnaires, which may introduce response biases. Despite these limitations, CQ training programs are increasingly implemented in multinational corporations, suggesting a pragmatic belief in its malleability. Future research should refine the construct by integrating objective performance metrics and longitudinal designs to validate its predictive validity.
❓ 文章によると、文化的知性(CQ)の概念に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは、感情的な側面よりも認知能力に重点を置きすぎている。
B. これは、文化が国内で均一であると仮定しており、内部の多様性を無視している。
C. 仕事の成功を予測する上で、IQよりも重要ではないことが証明されています。
D. 自己報告式の質問票では、応答バイアスのために測定することはできません。
✅ 正确答案
It assumes that cultures are uniform within a country, ignoring internal diversity.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first