The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century, primarily in response to the disproportionate placement of hazardous waste facilities in low-income and minority communities. Scholars argue that this inequity stems from systemic biases in policy-making and land-use planning, where marginalized groups often lack political representation and economic resources to resist such developments. Proponents of environmental justice advocate for a more inclusive approach, ensuring that all communities, regardless of socioeconomic status, have equal access to environmental benefits and protection from environmental harms. Recent studies indicate that integrating community voices into regulatory processes not only improves fairness but also enhances the effectiveness of environmental policies, as local knowledge often identifies risks and solutions overlooked by centralized authorities. However, critics caution that without addressing underlying power imbalances, procedural reforms may merely tokenize participation, leaving structural inequalities intact.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 환경 정의에서 절차적 개혁에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 핵심 주장은 무엇인가?
A. 지역사회의 참여는 필연적으로 더 나은 환경적 성과로 이어진다.
B. B) 근본적인 권력 불균형이 해결되지 않는다면 그러한 개혁은 표면적일 수 있다.
C. C) 유해 폐기물 시설은 실제로 모든 지역사회에 걸쳐 공정하게 분포되어 있다.
D. D) 환경 위험을 식별하는 데 있어 지역 지식은 일반적으로 신뢰할 수 없다.
✅ 正确答案
B) Such reforms may be superficial if fundamental power disparities remain unaddressed.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first