The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the late 20th century, primarily in response to the disproportionate placement of hazardous waste facilities in low-income and minority communities. Scholars argue that this inequity stems from systemic biases in policy-making and land-use planning, where marginalized groups often lack political representation and economic resources to resist such developments. Proponents of environmental justice advocate for a more inclusive approach, ensuring that all communities, regardless of socioeconomic status, have equal access to environmental benefits and protection from environmental harms. Recent studies indicate that integrating community voices into regulatory processes not only improves fairness but also enhances the effectiveness of environmental policies, as local knowledge often identifies risks and solutions overlooked by centralized authorities. However, critics caution that without addressing underlying power imbalances, procedural reforms may merely tokenize participation, leaving structural inequalities intact.
❓ この文章によると、環境正義における手続き的改革の批判者が挙げる主な論点は何ですか?
A. 地域社会の参加は、必然的により良い環境成果につながる。
B. B) 根本的な権力格差が是正されないままであれば、そのような改革は表面的なものに留まる可能性がある。
C. C) 有害廃棄物施設は実際にはすべてのコミュニティに公平に分布している。
D. D) 環境リスクを特定する上で、地域の知識は一般的に信頼できない。
✅ 正确答案
B) Such reforms may be superficial if fundamental power disparities remain unaddressed.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first