The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a counterpoint to traditional measures of cognitive ability. Unlike IQ, which focuses on abstract reasoning, CQ encompasses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. Researchers argue that CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive (the ability to plan and monitor cultural interactions), cognitive (knowledge of cultural norms and practices), motivational (the drive to engage with other cultures), and behavioral (the ability to adapt verbal and nonverbal actions). A longitudinal study by Earley and Ang found that high CQ scores predicted successful expatriate performance better than prior international experience alone. However, critics caution that CQ assessments often rely on self-reporting, which may be biased by social desirability. Nonetheless, the construct has practical implications for multinational teams, suggesting that training programs should target all four dimensions rather than merely providing factual cultural briefings.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 현재 문화 지능 평가의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 그들은 행동 기술을 희생하면서 인지 능력을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. 이는 응답자들이 사회적으로 용인되는 모습을 보이려는 욕구에 영향을 받을 수 있는 자기 보고 데이터에 기반하고 있습니다.
C. 그들은 이전 국제 경험에 비해 주재원 성과를 예측하는 데 실패한다.
D. 그들은 문화적 상호작용의 동기적 차원을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
They are based on self-reported data that may be influenced by respondents' desire to appear socially acceptable.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first