The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a counterpoint to traditional measures of cognitive ability. Unlike IQ, which focuses on abstract reasoning, CQ encompasses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. Researchers argue that CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive (the ability to plan and monitor cultural interactions), cognitive (knowledge of cultural norms and practices), motivational (the drive to engage with other cultures), and behavioral (the ability to adapt verbal and nonverbal actions). A longitudinal study by Earley and Ang found that high CQ scores predicted successful expatriate performance better than prior international experience alone. However, critics caution that CQ assessments often rely on self-reporting, which may be biased by social desirability. Nonetheless, the construct has practical implications for multinational teams, suggesting that training programs should target all four dimensions rather than merely providing factual cultural briefings.
❓ 文章によると、現在の文化的知性評価の主な限界は何ですか?
A. 彼らは行動スキルを犠牲にして認知能力を過度に重視している。
B. これらは自己申告データに基づいており、回答者が社会的に受け入れられたいという願望に影響される可能性があります。
C. 彼らは、以前の国際経験と比較して、駐在員の業績を予測することができない。
D. 彼らは文化的交流の動機付けの側面を無視している。
✅ 正确答案
They are based on self-reported data that may be influenced by respondents' desire to appear socially acceptable.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first