The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural shifts in climate or biodiversity, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic signatures such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, scholars debate its formal start date, with some suggesting the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration' and others pointing to early agricultural practices. This disagreement is not merely semantic; it influences how we perceive humanity's role in planetary change. If the Anthropocene began with industrialisation, then modern societies bear primary responsibility. Conversely, an early origin implies that human-environment interactions have always had transformative effects, complicating narratives of a pristine pre-human nature. Ultimately, the debate underscores the need for interdisciplinary dialogue between geology, history, and sociology to understand our collective footprint.