The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained traction in recent years, challenging the traditional view that neurological differences such as autism, ADHD, and dyslexia are inherently pathological. Proponents argue that these conditions represent natural variations in human cognition, shaped by evolutionary and genetic factors. Rather than seeking to 'cure' or normalize individuals, the neurodiversity paradigm advocates for societal accommodations that allow all people to contribute their unique strengths. Critics, however, caution that this framework may downplay the real struggles faced by some individuals, particularly those with severe impairments, who require intensive support. They emphasize the need for a balanced approach that respects both neurological differences and the clinical realities of disability. Ultimately, the debate reflects broader questions about how society defines normality and allocates resources.
❓ 이 글의 주요 요점은 무엇인가?
A. A. 신경다양성은 의학적 치료의 필요성을 없애는 보편적으로 인정된 개념이다.
B. B. 신경다양성 운동은 수용과 배려를 주장하지만, 비판자들은 심각한 사례를 무시하는 것에 대해 경고한다.
C. C. 모든 신경학적 상태는 순전히 유전적이며 어떠한 개입 없이 축하되어야 한다.
D. D. 전통적인 의학 모델은 자폐증과 ADHD를 치료하는 데 있어 신경다양성 접근법보다 우월하다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The neurodiversity movement argues for acceptance and accommodation, but critics warn against ignoring severe cases.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first