The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While some scientists argue for its formal recognition as a new geological epoch, citing markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels, others contend that the term is more cultural than geological. Critics emphasize that the proposed markers are not globally synchronous, a key criterion for defining an epoch, and that the timescale of human impact, though profound, remains too brief to compare with the deep-time transitions of the geological record. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between scientific rigor and the need to communicate the urgency of environmental change.
❓ According to the passage, what is a primary reason why some scientists oppose formalizing the Anthropocene as a geological epoch?
A. Human impact markers are not evenly distributed across the globe at the same time.
B. The term 'Anthropocene' was not originally proposed by a geologist.
C. Plastic pollution and nuclear fallout are not considered significant markers.
D. The geological record already includes many epochs with similar human influences.
✅ 正确答案
Human impact markers are not evenly distributed across the globe at the same time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first