The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. While the term remains unofficial in the geological timescale, its proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear evidence of a distinct epoch. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a clear starting point, with some suggesting the Industrial Revolution and others pointing to the advent of agriculture. This ambiguity complicates its formal adoption, yet the debate itself underscores a profound shift in how scientists perceive humanity's role in planetary change.
❓ 비평가들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 채택하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 지구 시스템에 대한 인간의 영향에 대한 증거가 불충분하다.
B. B. 이 용어는 환경 분야를 벗어나서는 주목을 받지 못했다.
C. C. 제안된 시대는 명확히 정의된 시작점이 부족하다.
D. D. 과학자들은 산업적 지표보다 농업에 초점을 맞추는 것을 선호한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. The proposed epoch lacks a clearly defined beginning.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first