The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. While the term remains unofficial in the geological timescale, its proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear evidence of a distinct epoch. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a clear starting point, with some suggesting the Industrial Revolution and others pointing to the advent of agriculture. This ambiguity complicates its formal adoption, yet the debate itself underscores a profound shift in how scientists perceive humanity's role in planetary change.
❓ What is the main reason critics oppose the formal adoption of the Anthropocene as a geological epoch?
A. A. There is insufficient evidence of human impact on Earth's systems.
B. B. The term has not gained traction outside environmental circles.
C. C. The proposed epoch lacks a clearly defined beginning.
D. D. Scientists prefer to focus on agriculture rather than industrial markers.
✅ 正确答案
C. The proposed epoch lacks a clearly defined beginning.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first