The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of a distinct boundary. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex, asynchronous human influences across different regions and times, and that formalizing it may distract from the urgent, ongoing dialogue about climate policy. The debate thus transcends mere geological classification, reflecting deeper tensions between scientific taxonomy and societal responsibility. Ultimately, whether the Anthropocene is officially adopted hinges not only on stratigraphic data but also on how we conceptualize our role in shaping the planet's future.
❓ 통과문에 따르면, 인류세(Anthropocene) 시대에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 지질학자들은 퇴적물에서 발견된 방사성 동위원소의 정확한 수치에 대해 의견이 일치하지 않는다.
B. 그 용어는 인간의 환경 영향이 불균등하고 다양하다는 성격을 모호하게 만들고, 정책적 조치에서 초점을 옮길 수 있다.
C. 플라스틱 오염은 지질학적 시간 경계를 나타내는 신뢰할 수 있는 지표가 아니다.
D. 이 제안은 새로운 세대(epoch)로 간주되기에 충분한 층서학적 증거가 부족하다.
✅ 正确答案
The term may obscure the uneven and varied nature of human environmental impact and shift focus from policy action.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first