The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, fundamentally shapes human societies and their cultural development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered innovation and civilization, while tropical regions were seen as less conducive to progress. However, modern scholars largely reject this simplistic causal relationship. They contend that human agency, technological advancement, and historical context play equally significant roles. For instance, the rise of Singapore as a global economic hub in a tropical setting challenges deterministic assumptions. Critics also point out that environmental determinism has been used to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies, making it a politically charged framework. Contemporary geography instead embraces 'possibilism,' which suggests that the environment offers a range of possibilities, and human choices determine which ones are realized. This shift reflects a broader academic movement toward nuanced, multi-causal explanations of societal development.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 기후가 사회를 형성하는 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 이는 환경과 인간 발달 사이의 관계를 지나치게 단순화한다.
C. C. 그것은 초기 지리학자들 사이에서만 인기가 있었다.
D. D. 그것은 싱가포르와 같은 국가들의 성공을 설명하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It oversimplifies the relationship between environment and human development.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first