The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were defined by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains controversial. Critics argue that human influence is not uniform across the planet, with some regions exhibiting minimal disturbance, and that the proposed markers, such as the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration,' are arbitrary. Proponents counter that the scale and permanence of human-induced changes, including species extinction rates and altered nitrogen cycles, justify a distinct stratigraphic boundary. This debate underscores the challenge of defining geological time in an era where human agency has become a dominant force, blurring the line between natural history and human history.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 비평가들은 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(epoch)로 공식 인정하는 것에 왜 반대하는가?
A. 인간의 영향이 전 지구적으로 일관되지 않고 제안된 지표들이 잠재적으로 자의적이기 때문이다.
B. B) 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염은 지질학적 기록에서 감지할 수 없기 때문이다.
C. C) '대가속(Great Acceleration)'이 경계로 간주되기에는 너무 이른 시기에 발생했기 때문이다.
D. D) 최근 수십 년간 종의 멸종 속도가 크게 변하지 않았기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
A) Because human impact is not globally consistent and proposed markers are potentially arbitrary.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first