The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch, characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were defined by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains controversial. Critics argue that human influence is not uniform across the planet, with some regions exhibiting minimal disturbance, and that the proposed markers, such as the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration,' are arbitrary. Proponents counter that the scale and permanence of human-induced changes, including species extinction rates and altered nitrogen cycles, justify a distinct stratigraphic boundary. This debate underscores the challenge of defining geological time in an era where human agency has become a dominant force, blurring the line between natural history and human history.
❓ 根据文章所述,批评者为何反对将人类世正式认定为新的地质时代?
A. A) 人間の影響は地球規模で一貫しておらず、提案された指標は恣意的である可能性があるため。
B. B) 核降下物やプラスチック汚染は地質学的記録では検出できないからである。
C. C) 「大加速」が発生した時期が早すぎて、境界として考慮するには適さないため。
D. D) なぜなら、ここ数十年で種の絶滅率に大きな変化が見られないからである。
✅ 正确答案
A) Because human impact is not globally consistent and proposed markers are potentially arbitrary.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first