The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to cross-cultural environments. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ specifically encompasses four dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the intrinsic interest and confidence to engage with other cultures, and behavioral CQ is the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research suggests that CQ predicts expatriate job performance and cross-cultural adjustment better than emotional intelligence or personality traits alone. However, critics argue that CQ measurement relies heavily on self-report instruments, which may be susceptible to social desirability bias, thereby questioning the construct's validity in high-stakes assessments.
❓ 根据文章内容,批评者提到的文化智力(CQ)的一个主要局限性是什么?
A. A) 文化智商并不能准确预测外派人员的工作表现。
B. B) 文化智力(CQ)的测量可能存在偏差,因为它依赖于自我报告。
C. C) CQ缺乏对其四个维度的明确定义。
D. D) 在跨文化环境中,文化智商不如情商重要。
✅ 正确答案
B) CQ measurement may be biased because it depends on self-reporting.