The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct enough to warrant a formal boundary. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex, uneven human-environment interactions, and that its formalization may obscure the deep-time perspective of geology. They suggest that focusing on a single start date ignores the gradual, multi-scalar nature of anthropogenic change, which began at different times in different regions. Ultimately, the debate reflects broader tensions between scientific classification and the need for public engagement with environmental crises.
❓ Согласно тексту, в чём заключается основная критика формального определения антропоцена?
A. A) Он опирается на маркеры, которые не встречаются в геологических слоях.
B. B) Он не учитывает разнообразный и постепенный характер воздействия человека на окружающую среду во времени и пространстве.
C. C) Это чрезмерно акцентирует ядерные осадки как наиболее важный маркер человеческой деятельности.
D. D) Он игнорирует роль пластикового загрязнения в современных условиях окружающей среды.
✅ 正确答案
B) It fails to account for the varied and gradual nature of human impact across time and space.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first