The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by human impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are stratigraphically distinct enough to warrant a formal boundary. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex, uneven human-environment interactions, and that its formalization may obscure the deep-time perspective of geology. They suggest that focusing on a single start date ignores the gradual, multi-scalar nature of anthropogenic change, which began at different times in different regions. Ultimately, the debate reflects broader tensions between scientific classification and the need for public engagement with environmental crises.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세를 공식적으로 정의하는 것에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 지질 층에서 발견되지 않는 표지자에 의존한다.
B. B) 이는 인간의 영향이 시간과 공간에 걸쳐 다양하고 점진적인 성격을 지닌다는 점을 설명하지 못한다.
C. C) 그것은 핵 낙진을 가장 중요한 인간의 지표로 지나치게 강조한다.
D. D) 현대 환경에서 플라스틱 오염의 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It fails to account for the varied and gradual nature of human impact across time and space.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first