The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current geological epoch in which human activity has become the dominant influence on climate and the environment. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a distinct geological time unit remains contentious among geologists. Critics argue that the markers of human impact, such as plastic pollution and nuclear fallout, may not be sufficiently distinct or long-lasting to define a clear boundary in the stratigraphic record. Proponents, however, contend that the unprecedented scale and irreversibility of human-induced changes, including biodiversity loss and alterations to the carbon cycle, justify a new epoch. This debate underscores not only scientific questions about Earth's history but also philosophical ones about humanity's role in shaping planetary futures.
❓ 地質学者たちの間で、人新世に関する主な意見の相違点は何ですか?
A. A. 人間の活動が環境に何らかの測定可能な影響を与えてきたかどうか。
B. B. 「人新世」という用語がポール・クルッツェンによって最初に造られたかどうか。
C. C. 人為的な変化が新たな地質時代を構成するほど重要であるかどうか。
D. D. 人新世は現在の時代ではなく、未来の時代と見なされるべきかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
C. Whether human-induced changes are significant enough to constitute a new geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first